Image: flockoffithaca.substack.com
The Story
Plymouth unplugged Flock cameras after canceling its contract; the supplied record says nothing about McKeesport.
The evidence supports a narrow account: Plymouth canceled its contract, Flock did not promptly acknowledge the notices, and the police chief disabled the equipment locally. The supplied record does not show a McKeesport cancellation or establish Flock’s legal position.
- What is establishedPlymouth disabled the cameras after its cancellation notices went unanswered.
- What remains openThe sources do not identify McKeesport or establish Flock’s legal position, removal plans, or intent.
- Plymouth’s police chief said the city notified Flock of cancellation, received no corporate or legal reply, and directed staff to disconnect the cameras.
- The Verge reports that Plymouth’s cameras remained in place for more than a month after the contract termination vote.
- The provided sources do not document a McKeesport contract cancellation or response from Flock there.
Deeper Insight
Plymouth had to pull Flock's plugs after canceling. Surveillance is easy to switch on, but stubbornly hard for the public to switch off.
Plymouth's police chief physically unplugged Flock cameras after the company did not respond to the city's cancellation notices. The cameras stayed in place for more than a month, showing how a public vote can end access before it ends the hardware or the vendor's leverage. Turning off surveillance may take more than saying no.
- What it could changeCities could demand removal plans before allowing vehicle-tracking cameras onto public streets.
- How it touches todayAcross several cities, canceled surveillance systems have outlasted the contracts meant to end them.
- Our futurePublic surveillance could become easier to install than to escape.
- Ithaca organizers reported that cameras and audio devices remained operational nearly three months after the council voted to end its Flock relationship.
- A separate report says one Illinois city had to send a cease-and-desist letter and cover Flock devices after termination.
- The Inference describes Plymouth as a case where the city had to unplug cameras itself because Flock did not acknowledge the cancellation.
Sources · 6
Featured · Analysis · flockoffithaca.substack.com
Ithaca canceled Flock, so why are the cameras still up?
Ithaca canceled Flock, so why are the cameras still up? ### The mass surveillance keeps running, and we're going to do something about it. Flock Off! Ithaca May 29, 2026 On March 4, the Ithaca Common Council voted to end the city’s relationship with Flock Safety. The resolution included a resolved c
Read sourceAnalysis · ipvm.com
Flock Denies Breaking Law In Conflict With City Terminating Flock (Public Report)
Flock Denies Breaking Law In Conflict With City Terminating Flock (Public Report) # Flock Denies Breaking Law In Conflict With City Terminating Flock IPVM Team • Published Sep 26, 2025 15:03 PM In August 2025, the Illinois State government said Flock violated state law. That same month, an Illinois
Read sourceAnalysis · theinference.org
Cities cancel Flock Safety but the cameras stay up; replacement deals flow to Axon · The Inference
Cities cancel Flock Safety but the cameras stay up; replacement deals flow to Axon · The Inference # Cities cancel Flock Safety but the cameras stay up; replacement deals flow to Axon Plymouth's council voted to cancel Flock and the company never acknowledged it, so the police chief unplugged the ca
Read source