Image: nbcnews.com
The Story
WhereAreThey.info makes UAP records easier to follow, but each chain still needs checking at the original document.
The site is best read as an organized index of public testimony and records, not as proof that every linked account is true. Its strongest entries point toward official hearings, transcripts, and government documents; its weaker entries preserve testimony or secondary material with explicit labels. Reliability therefore depends on checking each link against the underlying record rather than trusting the network shape alone.
- The archive links hearing pages and transcripts to official proceedings, including the 2023 House hearing and its witness statements.
- The claims ledger distinguishes official-record documentation from on-record testimony that is not independently confirmed and reports without a primary source.
- AARO's historical report says it found no evidence that official investigations confirmed extraterrestrial technology or reverse-engineering, showing why linked testimony must be separated from established findings.
Deeper Insight
A web of claims can look like corroboration. Click through before you believe the shape.
One click takes you from a hearing to testimony, a document, or a claim tagged unverified. That is the site’s useful trick, and its trap. A network can make repetition feel like proof, especially around the disputed legacy-program allegation. The map matters most when it shows where the primary record ends. Follow the link, not the crowd.
- The site presents a live network connecting people, incidents, hearings, and documents, while its ledger marks some material as claimed or unverified.
- The legacy-program entry preserves a chain from proposed legislation and sworn testimony to an official finding that found no evidence, making the disagreement visible rather than resolving it.
- The 2023 hearing page separates documented hearing facts from Grusch's testimony about a crash-retrieval program, illustrating the difference between a recorded statement and independently established evidence.
Sources · 8
- 1 Journals & institutions
- 1 News reporting
- 1 Forum, video, personal
- 5 Other / unclassified
What do these mean?
- Journals & institutions. Published in a peer-reviewed journal, or from a university, government body, court or other institution.
- News reporting. Journalism: newspapers, magazines and news sites.
- Forum, video, personal. Forums, social posts, video, blogs and personal accounts.
- Other / unclassified. A site we have not classified yet. This says nothing good or bad about it.
Featured · Analysis · reddit.com
Connecting the dots on UAP disclosure: 180+ people, incidents, hearings and documents, linked to their original source. LMKWYT
Forum or personal account
I built [https://wherearethey.info](https://wherearethey.info), a network that connects the dots on UAP and NHI disclosure. The people, incidents, programs, hearings and documents of the UAP story, laid out as one map you can explore. You can pick a thread and pull it. For example start with David Fravor and you're one click from the Nimitz incident, then from the other pilots and radar operators
Read sourceAnalysis · wherearethey.info
Claims ledger — Where Are They
Other
UAP claims database: every claim, who made it, its source # Claims ledger Documented: backed by an official record or primary document. Claimed: on-record testimony not independently confirmed. Unverified: reported without a primary source. ## The Day After Roswell - claimed A memoir credited to ret
Read sourcePrimary source · archive.dni.gov
Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena 25 ...
Institution
#### OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ## Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena ### 25 June 2021 SCOPE AND ASSUMPTIONS Scope This preliminary report is provided by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) in response to the provision in Senate Report 1
Read source