Weighing mainstream and alternative accounts…
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.
Investigated
Image: lesswrong.com
Backdoor success is usually measured by Attack Success Rate (ASR): how often a triggered input produces the attacker’s target output, alongside clean accuracy or utility. Stronger evaluation also compares poisoned and clean models, tests trigger stealthiness and semantic preservation, and checks whether outputs remain harmful or merely differ in wording. For removal, ASR alone can overstate success because it may treat refusal or harmless wording changes as genuine cures; richer assessments evaluate output quality on both triggered and ordinary inputs.
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Lens adapted to this topic: Beyond exact target outputs
A dissenting methodological view argues that conventional ASR can misclassify backdoor removal as successful when a model changes the exact target wording, refuses, or produces another problematic response. It favors evaluating output categories and usefulness on both triggered and non-triggered inputs, making behavioral persistence and normal utility explicit.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.