Weighing mainstream and alternative accounts…
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.
Investigated
Image: link.springer.com
Model interpretability auditing is the systematic assessment of whether a model’s explanations or internal-structure analyses are meaningful, reliable, and useful for checking properties such as fairness, safety, or accountability. The field remains unsettled: black-box explanations can help, but limited access, weak standards, and the difficulty of validating local explanations can sharply constrain what an audit demonstrates.
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Lens adapted to this topic: Limits and unresolved challenges
A skeptical perspective emphasizes that an explanation is not automatically evidence that a model is fair, safe, or understood. Model-agnostic methods may conceal important mechanisms; black-box access limits what auditors can test; local explanations may be difficult to sanity-check at scale; and mechanistic interpretability lacks standardized experimental auditing. This view treats audit conclusions as conditional on access, method, and validation.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.