Weighing mainstream and alternative accounts…
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.
Investigated
Image: universiteitleiden.nl
Yes, some protective practices continued after Christianization, often through amulets whose forms and uses resembled Roman precedents while their inscriptions became Christian. But the evidence does not show a single, uniform secret pagan survival: some users adapted older practices, while others may have maintained traditional cult identities, and the surviving record is uneven. Church condemnations indicate that Christian leaders regarded amulets as a real and persistent problem, even though many ordinary Christians appear to have treated them as compatible with Christian identity.
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
A more skeptical reading emphasizes hidden religious identities and the possibility that Christianization sometimes involved conformity or false conversion. Traditional cult adherence did persist among some elites, and amulets containing pagan motifs or spells may reflect more than harmless cultural memory. However, accusations and surviving objects cannot reliably reveal how many users secretly rejected Christianity.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.