Image: judicialwatch.org
The Story
D.C. allowed noncitizens to vote locally, but the public results do not show which contests the 578 voters marked.
The ordinary institutional reading is narrower than the headline: D.C. law allows eligible noncitizen residents to participate in local elections, while federal contests remain off-limits. Official election results confirm the election and its turnout, but the provided public results do not themselves identify the 578 voters or show which specific contests each person marked.
- D.C. law allows noncitizen residents to vote in local elections, while federal law prohibits noncitizen voting in federal elections.
- The D.C. Board of Elections reports 156,054 total ballots cast in the June 16, 2026, election.
- The official results pages provided do not independently identify the 578 noncitizen voters or their individual contests.
Source mix
7 sources
- 3 Groups & independent outlets
- 1 Forum, video, personal
- 3 Other / unclassified
Deeper Insight
The 578 names expose a live boundary: local belonging is lawful, while federal power and election safeguards remain tightly contested.
The deeper issue is the boundary between lawful local participation and claims of election-system vulnerability. Judicial Watch’s FOIA-derived table presents 578 noncitizen voters and party-affiliation totals, while congressional opposition frames D.C.’s policy as diluting citizen voting power. Those materials establish a documented count and political dispute, not proof of unlawful federal voting or coordinated fraud.
- Judicial Watch says D.C. Board of Elections records show 578 noncitizens voted and provides a ward-by-party table totaling that figure.
- The records describe participation in the June primary and special elections, but the provided excerpts do not prove that any noncitizen voted in a federal contest.
- Opponents of D.C.’s law argue that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections dilutes citizens’ voting power.
Sources · 7
- 3 Groups & independent outlets
- 1 Forum, video, personal
- 3 Other / unclassified
What do these mean?
- Groups & independent outlets. Think tanks, advocacy groups and independent outlets or blogs, on any side of the question. They publish with a point of view.
- Forum, video, personal. Forums, social posts, video, blogs and personal accounts.
- Other / unclassified. A site we have not classified yet. This says nothing good or bad about it.
Featured · Analysis · judicialwatch.org
Noncitizens Voted in Washington, DC – Update!
Think tank or advocacy group
578 Noncitizens Voted in DC’s June 2026 Election Judicial Watch Asks Court to Defend Arizona’s Verification of Voter Citizenship Judicial Watch Sues for Abdul El-Sayed Animal Euthanasia Records Judicial Watch Sues over American Jailed in Russia for 12.5 Years 578 Noncitizens Voted in DC’s June 2026 Election We received records from the District of Columbia Board of Elections revealing that 578 non
Read sourceAnalysis · judicialwatch.org
Primary ballots: DEM1, REP1, STG1, DEM2, REP2, STG2, … DEM8, REP8, STG8. Special: DEM,NPA,OTH, REP and STG
Think tank or advocacy group
Public Records Request - R014525-092326 WARD DEM NPA OTH REP STG Total 1 156 10 1 2 2 171 2 40 10 1 51 3 43 11 1 55 4 120 8 2 130 5 63 3 1 67 6 49 11 1 1 62 7 22 1 1 24 8 17 1 18 Total 510 55 2 4 7 578 Primary ballots: DEM1, REP1, STG1, DEM2, REP2, STG2, … DEM8, REP8, STG8. Special: DEM,NPA,OTH, REP
Read sourceAnalysis · billbruch.substack.com
US House: Noncitizens will NOT be Voting in Our Capital!
Forum or personal account
US House: Noncitizens will NOT be Voting in Our Capital! ### Educate. Advocate. Mitigate. Activate! Bill Bruch Jun 13, 2025 On June 10, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to overturn Washington, D.C.'s Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022, which allows noncitizens to
Read source