Weighing mainstream and alternative accounts…
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.
Investigated
Image: pixabay.com
Yes, in ordinary language inner speech can be externalized by speaking it aloud, while research also describes experiences in which verbal thoughts are attributed to an external space or source. Those are not necessarily the same process: vocalization is voluntary overt speech, whereas externalized voices can involve altered agency or reality monitoring, especially in hallucination research.
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Lens adapted to this topic: Challenges to treating inner speech as hidden overt speech
A dissenting line of analysis questions whether inner speech should be modeled as ordinary speech that has merely been internalized and can therefore be straightforwardly externalized. Phenomenological researchers emphasize that inner speaking may be partly or entirely unworded, simultaneous, or meaningless, while linguistic critics challenge the assumption that external, egocentric, and inner speech are discrete stages. On this view, vocalization and external-feeling verbal experience require separate explanations.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.