Weighing mainstream and alternative accounts…
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.
Investigated
Image: med.stanford.edu
Blocking 15-PGDH regenerated cartilage and improved joint outcomes in aged or injured mice, while treated human cartilage samples produced new tissue in laboratory studies. That is promising biology, not proof of a reliable human therapy: no source reports a completed clinical trial showing that patients avoided osteoarthritis or knee replacement.
Two lenses on the same evidence. Source weight and the primary source ratio show what each rests on.
The cautious interpretation emphasizes the gap between laboratory regeneration and clinical benefit. Mice and excised tissue cannot establish whether a treatment reaches diseased human joints safely, produces durable load-bearing cartilage, relieves pain, or prevents replacement surgery. Promotional claims about making knee replacement unnecessary therefore remain hypotheses rather than demonstrated outcomes.
Deeper threads worth pulling on next.