Image: pixabay.com
The Story
The Online Safety Act gives Ofcom strong tools for child protection, but strong tools still need narrow rules, transparency and oversight.
This is a difficult child-safety and platform-accountability law, not established evidence of a plan to reproduce China’s Great Firewall. Parliament created duties for services; Ofcom’s role is to supervise compliance, reduce illegal activity and protect children. The serious fault line is implementation: age checks, scanning powers and vague categories can burden privacy and lawful speech even when the stated purpose is legitimate.
- MandateOfcom regulates platforms’ systems and processes rather than directly deciding what every UK user may say.
- RiskTechnology notices, age assurance and broad safety duties can create surveillance or over-removal pressures.
- TestThe central question is whether safeguards, legal limits and public reporting constrain those powers in practice.
- The government presents the Act as a system of platform duties protecting children and adults from illegal or harmful online activity.
- Reuters found that widely shared claims overstated the Act’s direct powers over users, while acknowledging criticism that implementation can restrict legal content.
- Ofcom’s technology-notice regime concerns scanning for terrorism and child sexual abuse material, with unresolved legal and privacy issues around its use.
Deeper Insight
Safety checks become a censorship system when every lawful speaker must first prove who they are.
Five million daily age checks, warning screens and the power to scan private communications show how safety language can normalize identity checks and automated control. Platforms, regulators and governments gain a more governable internet; users lose privacy and reach. The China comparison is a warning about direction, not proof of a finished plan. Ordinary people still have courts, scrutiny and the right to resist quiet expansion.
- IncentivePlatforms may over-remove lawful material to avoid penalties, while regulators gain leverage over services that reach UK users.
- ExpansionA power introduced for child protection can establish infrastructure later used for wider monitoring or content control.
- AgencyTransparency, litigation and public pressure remain practical checks before exceptional tools become routine.
- Techdirt featured a comment saying Ofcom’s enforcement was being used as a pretext for an internet-censorship project modeled on China’s Great Firewall; this is a commenter’s interpretation, not an established finding.
- The Online Safety Act’s technology-notice power can require communications scanning for terrorism and child-abuse content, creating significant surveillance and encryption concerns.
- Commentary reports age restrictions, warning screens and restricted access to lawful political or cultural material after implementation, linking safety measures to broader speech effects.
Sources · 9
Featured · Analysis · techdirt.com
Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
This week, our first place winner on the insightful side is the first of several comments about Trump’s voting fraud squad proudly announcing the arrest of… 28 people in California. It’s an anonymous comment summing up their attitude : Republicans just want election fraud. That’s it. In second place, it’s a double-winning comment that also took second place over on the funny side. Once again it’s
Read sourceAnalysis · issuesincybercrimelaw.substack.com
UK digital surveillance through platform regulation: technology notices, encryption and regulatory ambiguity
UK digital surveillance through platform regulation: technology notices, encryption and regulatory ambiguity ### Ofcom has published its final guidance on technology notices, the controversial power to scan communications for terrorism and child abuse content. Jessica Shurson May 15, 2026 The UK’s O
Read sourceAnalysis · aljazeera.com
Britain calls it safety. It is censorship | Social Media | Al Jazeera
Britain calls it safety. It is censorship | Social Media | Al Jazeera # Britain calls it safety. It is censorship The Online Safety Act, sold as child protection, now hides Gaza’s suffering, silences dissent and exports censorship to the world. By Raphael Tsavkko Garcia Brazilian journalist and rese
Read source