Image: aslihantuncay.substack.com
The Story
The Spacious Present reframes time, but no cited experiment shows a future event changing an earlier one.
The Spacious Present is a metaphysical interpretation of time, not a demonstrated mechanism for changing the past. Quantum delayed-choice results concern measurement context and data grouping, while precognition findings have faced serious methodological criticism. A scientific case for retrocausal influence would require reproducible effects, a clear mechanism, and controls that rule out statistical or interpretive artifacts.
- Delayed-choice and quantum-eraser experiments do not establish backward causation, consciousness effects, or reversal of time.
- Critiques of Bem’s precognition research identify procedural and analytical flaws that make retroactive influence an untenable interpretation.
- A review of precognition claims identifies missing theory, possible selective filtering, and confusion between explanation and phenomenon explained.
Deeper Insight
Seth's Spacious Present has your future self leaving hints in dreams and urges. Intuition becomes mail from who you might become.
Picture a film reel with every frame already there. Seth, the spirit voice in Jane Roberts' channeled books, says consciousness moves through that reel, and a probable future self can reach back through dreams, urges and visions. Philosophers of science treat backward causation as coherent in some models. If Seth is right, a hunch is a message from a version of you that already chose.
- What it could changeIf future selves can nudge present choices, intuition would become a channel worth training, not a feeling to dismiss.
- How it touches todaySeth's ideas still shape how New Age readers treat dreams and urges as guidance.
- Our futureChoosing well may mean listening for someone we haven't become yet.
- The originating account links Seth’s Spacious Present to a block-universe picture while rejecting a fixed, fatalistic future and placing consciousness at reality’s foundation.
- Seth-oriented discussion describes simultaneous time as inaccessible in full to ordinary minds but potentially encountered through memory, imagination, and other experiences.
- Seth material describes a future probable self influencing present choices through dreams, urges, or visions; this is a spiritual account, not an established physical mechanism.
Sources · 7
Featured · Analysis · thenobodysociety.substack.com
A Dialogue of Time and Becoming
A Dialogue of Time and Becoming - by Mhyst ### the one who chooses and the field that offers choices are one and the same. The infinite you, trying to make sense of the you in limitation Mhyst Oct 25, 2026 When people describe the Block Universe, it often sounds like a frozen cube—a static, four-dimensional loaf where everything has already happened. In Einstein and Minkowski’s spacetime, there is
Read sourceAnalysis · sethtalks.com
Understanding simultaneous time - Seth Talks
Understanding simultaneous time - Seth Talks # Understanding simultaneous time Lena January 14, 2015, 10:18pm 1 So I’ve been re-reading NoPR (and getting a lot more out of it this time, yay) and I’ve come to the section where he talks relatively briefly about time being simultaneous and our concept
Read sourceAnalysis · cambridge.org
Backward Causation: Harder Than It Looks | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
Backward Causation: Harder Than It Looks | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core ## Article contents - Abstract - Introduction - Causation in the Mentaculus - The Possibility of Backward Causation - The rampancy of backward causation - The Dispersion Mechanism - Implications for control - Conclusio
Read source